[Capri25] Backstay question -- Reminder on WYC Capri 25 Fleet Rules
Dan McNamara
mcnamara at visi.com
Tue Dec 30 22:45:22 UTC 2008
For those interested,
A tangental piece of equipment is the jib cunningham. On Consensus we
play this more then the backstay and vang. And always in with added
backstay tension to de-power in a puff. Before each race we set our
rig to the lulls, our halyards to the average. When the puff hits the
sheets get eased, the jib cunningham goes on hard and the driver
feathers up. The jib cunningham gets eased as the bow comes down.
Because of this we have never maxed out our backstay. The driver uses
it to balance the helm, the trimmer may put it on hard after the genoa
has been eased. It is not to say that we should not goto our backstay
sooner but the reality is that the trimmer and driver have their hands
full where the Foredeck can actively trim the jib cunningham in the
puffs. Another advantage is it brings the Genoa draft forward,
backstay alone brings the draft back. The two in tandem keep the
draft forward, reduce headstay sag, bend the mast aft flattening the
main and opening the slot.
I guess it would not hurt to beef up the headstay tang but I don't see
a need for a more powerful backstay if all the other things you can do
to keep the boat flat and going up wind are happening.
The whole premiss of the WYC fleet is the take an inexpensive boat
(poorly design and hard to race to its rating) and race it one-
design. Having just campaigned a J 24 for the North American's I have
a greater appreciation for our rules ( 6 pages vs over 80 and
thousands of appeals). Our scant 6 pages have captured the essence of
what it takes to be a one-design by keeping the keel, rudder and rig
uniform, sails to fit a box and allowing any other modifications.
Starting with a POS boat it is more important to have a good crew then
good gear. The WYC C25 one design rules captured this perfectly
allowing each boat to layout their deck to maximize their crew work.
When we get beat by more then a boat length it was either my tactics
or a crew mistake that cost us. Every one in the fleet has the same
design problems to overcome, how well each boat does that usually
decides that race. Why any one would race a Capri 25 handicapped is
beyond me.
Dan McNamara
WYC C25 Crew of the Year
On Dec 30, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Glenn Selvin wrote:
> We are a Southern California based Capri 25. In fact, we used the
> factory tangs as attachment points for our cascading backstay, and
> upon that backstay upgrade, I decided that I'd better beef up our
> headstay attachment.
>
> My plan is simply to leave the factory bow fitting in place, and to
> simply install a new tang, through bolted to the bow. That tang
> will not be welded to the bow fitting, as I don't feel like going
> through the gyrations of removing that factory fitting so as to take
> it to a welder. Instead, I'll simply install the new bow tang,
> laying it right over the existing factory piece. Thus, the headstay
> will attach to BOTH the existing factory piece, AND the bow tang
> through bolted to the bow.
>
> Why Catalina didn't do this to begin with is beyond me. And as to
> the Wayzata fleet? Why not change your bylaws and allow the
> backstay upgrade? Its much nicer than the "pinch the wires
> together" system.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Hammett
> To: Garry Cooke ; Ruedenberg,Emanuel (Rudy)
> Cc: capri25 at lists.wyc.org ; Kenneth Reiff
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:38 AM
> Subject: Re: [Capri25] Backstay question -- Reminder on WYC Capri 25
> Fleet Rules
>
> Greetings Everyone;
>
> I would like to remind all the local Capri 25 Fleet members that are
> reviewing this discussion thread that the installation of a cascaded
> backstay is a departure from the local fleet rules - A cascaded
> backstay was installed on Capri 25 #009 "Divine Inspiration" and was
> later disallowed because it altered the original running rig as
> defined by the local rules. For all the out of town Capri's its a
> great way to get additional purchase and manual force to reduce
> headstay sag and flex the mast, bending the center forward to force
> for a flatter main in heavy air.
>
> Engineering Notes: Cascading Backstays and Headsail Tacks
>
> Backstay -- The angle of the backstay is very important due to the
> roach of the standard mainsails. PHRF mains that conform to the
> original Capri 25 rules (the PHRF standard) have a greater roach
> than our local Capris. This means that cascading blocks should use
> the original chainplate positions on the stern and not be lead
> directly to the eye on the cockpit deck aft of the rudder post. That
> eye is for the adjuster rig only. If you cascade to the eye on deck
> the backstay angle is reduced by as much as 6 inches, which makes
> low wind tacks and gybes of the mainsail difficult. Especially so if
> you use a small amount of backstay to create a better entry on the
> headsail for sailing up wind.
>
> The headstay plate -- This can be changed to the J24 hardware with
> minimal alterations (but to bend it with a hammer and vise may
> weaken the plate). Several of the local Capris in the WYC fleet
> have had a 6" L x 3/16" T x 1" W - SS chainplate welded to the
> original tack plate and have 1 to 3 countersunk 3/8" dia. screws and
> a reinforcement block on the inside with fender washers and lock
> nuts. The total length of the chainplate addition is up to the owner
> but 6 inches (with 2 holes) is typical. The rub-rail on the bow
> point does not need to be removed; just slightly altered to
> accommodate the chainplate thickness and width when installing it
> underneath. I use a 1" chissle to pry the aluminum rail from the
> hull. The chissle will stretch the aluminum nicely without breaking
> it. Just be gentle and be sure you remove the mounting screws under
> the rubber (the most forward ones) first.
>
> One good thing about adding the chainplate in the bow -- it you t-
> bone someone -- the damage to your bow will be significantly reduced
> -- just ask the guys on Fore Sail who tapped Ham-It-Up! this year...
>
> Happy sailing,
>
> Mark Hammett
> Capri 25 #370
> Ham-It-Up!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Garry Cooke
> Sent: Dec 30, 2008 9:53 AM
> To: "Ruedenberg, Emanuel (Rudy)"
> Cc: capri25 at lists.wyc.org, Kenneth Reiff
> Subject: Re: [Capri25] Backstay question
>
> sorry I noticed a typing error, the 35% should be 25%.
> regards
> Garry
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Garry Cooke
> <garry.cooke at gmail.com> wrote:
> You need to be careful how much force you are putting into your
> boat. The backstay tension should be limited to no more than 35% the
> breaking strain of the backstay wire. If you put too much tension in
> the rig, you will increase significantly the compression force in
> the mast and risk damage to the bottom of your boat. I know of two
> Express 30's where the owners put too much back stay tension and
> drove the mast down, and cracked the bottom of the boat, and in one
> case, let water in. I also know of some Viking 28's where the deck
> has been buckled by too much backstay tension. It would be wise to
> get a Loos gauge to ensure that you are not over stressing your rig.
>
> good luck
> Garry
> Capri 25 'Endeavour'
>
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ruedenberg, Emanuel (Rudy) <Emanuel.Ruedenberg at bsci.com
> > wrote:
> You should definitely call Bruce Tamm from 'Tsunami' if he does not
> answer this email. He and I know others, have had terrible problems
> at the bow. I seem to remember that the force of the forestay
> separated the foredeck or something…..
>
>
> good luck
>
>
> rudy
>
>
>
>
>
> Emanuel 'Rudy' Ruedenberg
>
> Sr. Quality Engineer
>
> CQE,CQA
>
> Boston Scientific
>
> 763-494-1468
>
> Cell 612-201-7238
>
> MS B260
>
>
> From: capri25-bounces at lists.wyc.org [mailto:capri25-bounces at lists.wyc.org
> ] On Behalf Of Kenneth Reiff
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:28 AM
> To: capri25 at lists.wyc.org
> Subject: [Capri25] Backstay question
>
>
> We've replaced the standard "pinch the two wires together" type of
> backstay adjuster with a very nice, and powerful, cascade system as
> we've always had problems getting the backstay tight enough to get
> rid of headstay sag while in breeze. With this new cascading
> system, trust me, we're not going to have headstay problems anymore.
>
> My question? I looked below at the very front of the boat in front
> of that little wooden piece, and the headstay fitting is only
> through bolted at the top with no back up plate, and only one bolt
> in the front stem, under the rub rail. Typical Catalina
> construction... cheap.
>
> Has anyone in the Wayzata fleet improved their backstay adjusting
> arrangement with a more powerful cascade? And has anyone ever
> beefed up the headstay piece? I'm thinking of removing it, then
> welding on a much longer tang, so that I have about three bolts
> through the stem of the boat, not just one. Plus, Catalina used no
> back up plates, only washers, which scares me. Has anyone put on
> too much backstay tension and yanked the headstay fitting right off
> the freaking deck? Or am I just being paranoid because these boats
> are built so poorly? Thoughts on yanking off your headstay fitting
> would be appreciated. If you could, please email me at
>
> --
> Ken Reiff
> Email: kenreiff at gmail.com
> Cell: 562-637-6630
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Capri25 mailing list
> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
>
>
>
> --
> e-mail: garry.cooke at gmail.com
>
>
>
> --
> e-mail: garry.cooke at gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Capri25 mailing list
> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
> _______________________________________________
> Capri25 mailing list
> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wyc.org/pipermail/capri25/attachments/20081230/b36d290b/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Capri25
mailing list