[Capri25] Backstay question -- Reminder on WYC Capri 25 Fleet Rules

Dan McNamara mcnamara at visi.com
Tue Dec 30 23:05:43 UTC 2008


If we did not average over 25 Capri 25's at the starting line for each  
race I too would race a different boat.


On Dec 30, 2008, at 4:52 PM, Glenn Selvin wrote:

> Our boat came with a jib cunningham...  I took it off as it did  
> little more than get in the way.  Our problem has been headstay sag,  
> plain and simple.  Our "pinch the wires together" system never  
> worked quite right, in that I think the backstay is too long, thus,  
> the sheaves are bottoming out on those little wire legs before its  
> becoming effective.
>
> So...  I could either drop the rig and replace the backstay with a  
> shorter version, or, I could simply do away with the "pinch the  
> wires together" system and simply do it the right way by cascading  
> the shit out of it.  And since there is zero Capri 25 one design  
> sailing in Southern California, and since we're forced to race PHRF  
> with our 25, cascading made sense.
>
> When I want to sail one design?  Thanks, but I'll sail my Finn.   :)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Dan McNamara
> To: Glenn Selvin
> Cc: Mark Hammett ; Garry Cooke ; Ruedenberg,Emanuel (Rudy) ; capri25 at lists.wyc.org 
>  ; Kenneth Reiff
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Capri25] Backstay question -- Reminder on WYC Capri 25  
> Fleet Rules
>
> For those interested,
>
> A tangental piece of equipment is the jib cunningham.  On Consensus  
> we play this more then the backstay and vang.  And always in with  
> added backstay tension to de-power in a puff.  Before each race we  
> set our rig to the lulls, our halyards to the average.  When the  
> puff hits the sheets get eased, the jib cunningham goes on hard and  
> the driver feathers up.  The jib cunningham gets eased as the bow  
> comes down.  Because of this we have never maxed out our backstay.   
> The driver uses it to balance the helm, the trimmer may put it on  
> hard after the genoa has been eased.  It is not to say that we  
> should not goto our backstay sooner but the reality is that the  
> trimmer and driver have their hands full where the Foredeck can  
> actively trim the jib cunningham in the puffs.  Another advantage is  
> it brings the Genoa draft forward, backstay alone brings the draft  
> back.  The two in tandem keep the draft forward, reduce    headstay  
> sag, bend the mast aft flattening the main and opening the slot.
>
> I guess it would not hurt to beef up the headstay tang but I don't  
> see a need for a more powerful backstay if all the other things you  
> can do to keep the boat flat and going up wind are happening.
>
> The whole premiss of the WYC fleet is the take an inexpensive boat  
> (poorly design and hard to race to its rating) and race it one-  
> design.  Having just campaigned a J 24 for the North American's I  
> have a greater appreciation for our rules ( 6 pages vs over 80 and  
> thousands of appeals).  Our scant 6 pages have captured the essence  
> of what it takes to be a one-design by keeping the keel, rudder and  
> rig uniform, sails to fit a box and allowing any other  
> modifications.  Starting with a POS boat it is more important to  
> have a good crew then good gear.  The WYC C25 one design rules  
> captured this perfectly allowing each boat to layout their deck to  
> maximize their crew work.  When we get beat by more then a boat  
> length it was either my tactics or a crew mistake that cost us.  
> Every one in the fleet has the same design problems to overcome, how  
> well each boat does that usually decides that race.  Why any one  
> would race a Capri 25 handicapped is beyond me.
>
> Dan McNamara
> WYC C25 Crew of the Year
>
>
>
>
> On Dec 30, 2008, at 12:43 PM, Glenn Selvin wrote:
>
>> We are a Southern California based Capri 25.  In fact, we used the  
>> factory tangs as attachment points for our cascading backstay, and  
>> upon that backstay upgrade, I decided that I'd better beef up our  
>> headstay attachment.
>>
>> My plan is simply to leave the factory bow fitting in place, and to  
>> simply install a new tang, through bolted to the bow.   That tang  
>> will not be welded to the bow fitting, as I don't feel like going  
>> through the gyrations of removing that factory fitting so as to  
>> take it to a welder.  Instead, I'll simply install the new bow  
>> tang, laying it right over the existing factory piece.  Thus, the  
>> headstay will attach to BOTH the existing factory piece, AND the  
>> bow tang through bolted to the bow.
>>
>> Why Catalina didn't do this to begin with is beyond me.  And as to  
>> the Wayzata fleet?  Why not change your bylaws and allow the  
>> backstay upgrade?  Its much nicer than the "pinch the wires  
>> together" system.
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Mark Hammett
>> To: Garry Cooke ; Ruedenberg,Emanuel (Rudy)
>> Cc: capri25 at lists.wyc.org ; Kenneth Reiff
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 10:38 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Capri25] Backstay question -- Reminder on WYC Capri  
>> 25 Fleet Rules
>>
>> Greetings Everyone;
>>
>> I would like to remind all the local Capri 25 Fleet members that  
>> are reviewing this discussion thread that the installation of a  
>> cascaded backstay is a departure from the local fleet rules - A  
>> cascaded backstay was installed on Capri 25 #009 "Divine  
>> Inspiration" and was later disallowed because it altered the  
>> original running rig as defined by the local rules. For all the out  
>> of town Capri's its a great way to get additional purchase and  
>> manual force to reduce headstay sag and flex the mast, bending the  
>> center forward to force for a flatter main in heavy air.
>>
>> Engineering Notes:  Cascading Backstays and Headsail Tacks
>>
>> Backstay -- The angle of the backstay is very important due to the  
>> roach of the standard mainsails. PHRF mains that conform to the  
>> original Capri 25 rules (the PHRF standard) have a greater roach  
>> than our local Capris. This means that cascading blocks should use  
>> the original chainplate positions on the stern and not be lead  
>> directly to the eye on the cockpit deck aft of the rudder post.  
>> That eye is for the adjuster rig only.  If you cascade to the eye  
>> on deck the backstay angle is reduced by as much as 6 inches, which  
>> makes low wind tacks and gybes of the mainsail difficult.  
>> Especially so if you use a small amount of backstay to create a  
>> better entry on the headsail for sailing up wind.
>>
>> The headstay plate -- This can be changed to the J24 hardware with  
>> minimal alterations (but to bend it with a hammer and vise may  
>> weaken the plate).  Several of the local Capris in the WYC fleet  
>> have had a 6" L x 3/16" T x 1" W - SS chainplate welded to the  
>> original tack plate and have 1 to 3 countersunk 3/8" dia. screws  
>> and a reinforcement block on the inside with fender washers and  
>> lock nuts. The total length of the chainplate addition is up to the  
>> owner but 6 inches (with 2 holes) is typical.  The rub-rail on the  
>> bow point does not need to be removed; just slightly altered to  
>> accommodate the chainplate thickness and width when installing it  
>> underneath. I use a 1" chissle to pry the aluminum rail from the  
>> hull.  The chissle will stretch the aluminum nicely without  
>> breaking it. Just be gentle and be sure you remove the mounting  
>> screws under the rubber (the most forward ones) first.
>>
>> One good thing about adding the chainplate in the bow -- it you t- 
>> bone someone -- the damage to your bow will be significantly  
>> reduced -- just ask the guys on Fore Sail who tapped Ham-It-Up!  
>> this year...
>>
>> Happy sailing,
>>
>> Mark Hammett
>> Capri 25 #370
>> Ham-It-Up!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Garry Cooke
>> Sent: Dec 30, 2008 9:53 AM
>> To: "Ruedenberg, Emanuel (Rudy)"
>> Cc: capri25 at lists.wyc.org, Kenneth Reiff
>> Subject: Re: [Capri25] Backstay question
>>
>> sorry I noticed a typing error, the 35% should be 25%.
>> regards
>> Garry
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Garry Cooke  
>> <garry.cooke at gmail.com> wrote:
>> You need to be careful how much force you are putting into your  
>> boat. The backstay tension should be limited to no more than 35%  
>> the breaking strain of the backstay wire. If you put too much  
>> tension in the rig, you will increase significantly the compression  
>> force in the mast and risk damage to the bottom of your boat. I  
>> know of two Express 30's where the owners put too much back stay  
>> tension and drove the mast down, and cracked the bottom of the  
>> boat, and in one case, let water in. I also know of some Viking  
>> 28's where the deck has been buckled by too much backstay tension.  
>> It would be wise to get a Loos gauge to ensure that you are not  
>> over stressing your rig.
>>
>> good luck
>> Garry
>> Capri 25 'Endeavour'
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ruedenberg, Emanuel (Rudy) <Emanuel.Ruedenberg at bsci.com 
>> > wrote:
>> You should definitely call Bruce Tamm from 'Tsunami' if he does not  
>> answer this email.  He and I know others, have had terrible  
>> problems at the bow.  I seem to remember that the force of the  
>> forestay separated the foredeck or something…..
>>
>>
>>
>> good luck
>>
>>
>>
>> rudy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Emanuel 'Rudy' Ruedenberg
>>
>> Sr. Quality Engineer
>>
>> CQE,CQA
>>
>> Boston Scientific
>>
>> 763-494-1468
>>
>> Cell 612-201-7238
>>
>> MS B260
>>
>>
>>
>> From: capri25-bounces at lists.wyc.org [mailto:capri25-bounces at lists.wyc.org 
>> ] On Behalf Of Kenneth Reiff
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 2:28 AM
>> To: capri25 at lists.wyc.org
>> Subject: [Capri25] Backstay question
>>
>>
>>
>> We've replaced the standard "pinch the two wires together" type of  
>> backstay adjuster with a very nice, and powerful, cascade system as  
>> we've always had problems getting the backstay tight enough to get  
>> rid of headstay sag while in breeze.  With this new cascading  
>> system, trust me, we're not going to have headstay problems anymore.
>>
>> My question?  I looked below at the very front of the boat in front  
>> of that little wooden piece, and the headstay fitting is only  
>> through bolted at the top with no back up plate, and only one bolt  
>> in the front stem, under the rub rail.  Typical Catalina  
>> construction...  cheap.
>>
>> Has anyone in the Wayzata fleet improved their backstay adjusting  
>> arrangement with a more powerful cascade?  And has anyone ever  
>> beefed up the headstay piece? I'm thinking of removing it, then  
>> welding on a much longer tang, so that I have about three bolts  
>> through the stem of the boat, not just one.  Plus, Catalina used no  
>> back up plates, only washers, which scares me.  Has anyone put on  
>> too much backstay tension and yanked the headstay fitting right off  
>> the freaking deck?  Or am I just being paranoid because these boats  
>> are built so poorly?  Thoughts on yanking off your headstay fitting  
>> would be appreciated.  If you could, please email me at
>>
>> -- 
>> Ken Reiff
>> Email:  kenreiff at gmail.com
>> Cell:     562-637-6630
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Capri25 mailing list
>> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
>> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> e-mail: garry.cooke at gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> e-mail: garry.cooke at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Capri25 mailing list
>> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
>> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
>> _______________________________________________
>> Capri25 mailing list
>> Capri25 at lists.wyc.org
>> http://lists.wyc.org/mailman/listinfo/capri25
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.wyc.org/pipermail/capri25/attachments/20081230/96e2749a/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the Capri25 mailing list